Hager v. Willis

S.D. Alabama

Hager v. Willis

DecidedJune 24, 2021

Docket1:20-cv-00248

StatusUnknown

This text of Hager v. Willis (Hager v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hager v. Willis, (S.D. Ala. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KRISTY HAGER, as Personal ) Representative and Sole Beneficiary ) of the Estate of Raymond E. Hager, ) Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-00248-KD-B SHIRLEY WILLIS, as a Licensed Edward Jones Stockbroker and Licensed Edward __) Jones Branch Manager Broker, et al., ) Defendant. ORDER This action 1s before the Court on sua sponte review of the docket. Previously, Defendants Shirley Willis and Edward D. Jones and Company, L.P. moved to compel arbitration. The motion was granted, the action was stayed as to these Defendants, and the parties were ordered to file a report as to the status of the arbitration (doc. 51). On March 1, 2021, as ordered, Defendants reported that Plaintiff Kristy Hager’s counsel discussed arbitration with defense counsel on February 23, 2021, but Hager had not initiated an arbitration claim (doc. 67). The parties were ordered to file another status report (doc. 69). On May 7, 2021, as ordered, Defendants reported that Hager had not initiated arbitration and had not contacted defense counsel. Defendants requested that Hager “be ordered to inform the Court as to whether she intends to proceed with the arbitration of this action.” (doc. 73). Hager was ordered to file with the Court, on or before June 16, 2021, notice as to whether she did or did not intend to proceed with the arbitration (doc. 77). Hager was warned that if she failed to comply with the order, the stay would be lifted and this action against the Edwards

Jones Defendants would be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of this Court, as no lesser sanctions are sufficient (doc. 77). To date, Hager has not filed the notice as ordered. Accordingly, the stay is LIFTED and this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of this Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See. Hobson v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 2015 WL 4111661, *4 (N.D. Ala. July 8, 2015) (dismissing claims after plaintiffs failed to comply with order to arbitrate) (citing Windward Agency, Inc. v. Cologne Life Reinsurance Co., 123 Fed. Appx. 418 (3rd Cir. 2005) (for its holding that the issue of plaintiff's failure to submit a claim to arbitration was for the court which compelled arbitration to decide, not the arbitrator). The claims against all Defendants having now been dismissed, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action. DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of June 2021.

s/Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KRISTY HAGER, as Personal ) Representative and Sole Beneficiary ) of the Estate of Raymond E. Hager, ) Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-00248-KD-B SHIRLEY WILLIS, as a Licensed Edward Jones Stockbroker and Licensed Edward __) Jones Branch Manager Broker, et al., ) Defendant. ORDER This action 1s before the Court on sua sponte review of the docket. Previously, Defendants Shirley Willis and Edward D. Jones and Company, L.P. moved to compel arbitration. The motion was granted, the action was stayed as to these Defendants, and the parties were ordered to file a report as to the status of the arbitration (doc. 51). On March 1, 2021, as ordered, Defendants reported that Plaintiff Kristy Hager’s counsel discussed arbitration with defense counsel on February 23, 2021, but Hager had not initiated an arbitration claim (doc. 67). The parties were ordered to file another status report (doc. 69). On May 7, 2021, as ordered, Defendants reported that Hager had not initiated arbitration and had not contacted defense counsel. Defendants requested that Hager “be ordered to inform the Court as to whether she intends to proceed with the arbitration of this action.” (doc. 73). Hager was ordered to file with the Court, on or before June 16, 2021, notice as to whether she did or did not intend to proceed with the arbitration (doc. 77). Hager was warned that if she failed to comply with the order, the stay would be lifted and this action against the Edwards

Jones Defendants would be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of this Court, as no lesser sanctions are sufficient (doc. 77). To date, Hager has not filed the notice as ordered. Accordingly, the stay is LIFTED and this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of this Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See. Hobson v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 2015 WL 4111661, *4 (N.D. Ala. July 8, 2015) (dismissing claims after plaintiffs failed to comply with order to arbitrate) (citing Windward Agency, Inc. v. Cologne Life Reinsurance Co., 123 Fed. Appx. 418 (3rd Cir. 2005) (for its holding that the issue of plaintiff's failure to submit a claim to arbitration was for the court which compelled arbitration to decide, not the arbitrator). The claims against all Defendants having now been dismissed, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action. DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of June 2021.

s/Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hager v. Willis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hager-v-willis-alsd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack