Hager v. Weber

73 A.2d 848, 8 N.J. Super. 252, 1950 N.J. Super. LEXIS 688
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJune 14, 1950
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 73 A.2d 848 (Hager v. Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hager v. Weber, 73 A.2d 848, 8 N.J. Super. 252, 1950 N.J. Super. LEXIS 688 (N.J. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only ground advanced by defendant-appellant, Charles Weber, for reversal of the judgment entered against him in the sum of $6,500, by the Middlesex County Court, Law Division, is that the verdict of the jury is excessive. The plaintiff’s action is grounded upon defendant’s [253]*253negligence as the proximate cause of plaintiff’s damages arising out of an automobile accident.

We have carefully reviewed the record and are satisfied that the verdict is clearly excessive. It should be reduced to the sum of $3,500 and we so direct. If this is not acceptable to plaintiff, then, in view of the fact that defendant has not raised any question as to the jury’s finding of liability against him, a new trial for damages only is directed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keiffer v. Food Products Trucking Co.
179 A.2d 754 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Murphy v. Terzako
82 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
BALIP AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS, INC. v. Schroeder
73 A.2d 848 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.2d 848, 8 N.J. Super. 252, 1950 N.J. Super. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hager-v-weber-njsuperctappdiv-1950.