Hager v. Paddleford
15 N.E.2d 672, 278 N.Y. 515
Opinion
In each action: Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lotjghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hager v. Paddleford, 15 N.E.2d 672, 278 N.Y. 515 (N.Y. 1938).
15 N.E.2d 672 (Hager v. Paddleford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Venstone Stone v. District of Columbia
237 F.2d 28 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)