Hagens v. Farooq

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hagens v. Farooq

187 A.D.2d 563, 591 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13028

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 563 (Hagens v. Farooq) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagens v. Farooq, 187 A.D.2d 563, 591 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13028 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated July 16, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant claims there are factual issues, necessitating a trial, relating to her inability to secure a mortgage. She failed, however, to make an evidentiary showing in support of this assertion. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Kypreos v Spiridellis, 124 AD2d 786; cf., Gonzalez v Lebron, 126 AD2d 700). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated July 16, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant claims there are factual issues, necessitating a trial, relating to her inability to secure a mortgage. She failed, however, to make an evidentiary showing in support of this assertion. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Kypreos v Spiridellis, 124 AD2d 786; cf., Gonzalez v Lebron, 126 AD2d 700). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 563, 591 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagens-v-farooq-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack