Hagenbuch v. Phillips

3 A. 788, 112 Pa. 284
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 3 A. 788 (Hagenbuch v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hagenbuch v. Phillips, 3 A. 788, 112 Pa. 284 (Pa. 1886).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered March 15th, 1886.

Per Curiam.

It is now well settled law in Pennsylvania that a married woman, by mortgage duly executed and acknowledged, when her husband joins therein, may bind her real estate. This she may do whether it be to secure the payment of a debt due by herself, or by her husband, or by a stranger. As she may, according to the form prescribed by' the statute, convey her real estate by deed, absolute on its face, so she may, in like manner, execute and acknowledge a defeasible deed or mortgage to bind her real estate, and which may result in passing all hér title therein to a purchaser under the mortgage.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hastings Bank of Hastings v. Covitch
188 A. 129 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Alliance Fin. Corp. Plain. v. Abrams
97 Pa. Super. 528 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Bonner v. Randal
7 Pa. D. & C. 294 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Bartholomew v. Allentown National Bank
103 A. 954 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
De Roux v. Girard's Ex'r
112 F. 89 (Third Circuit, 1901)
Kuhn v. Ogilvie
35 A. 957 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A. 788, 112 Pa. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagenbuch-v-phillips-pa-1886.