Hagen & Strandgaard, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hagen & Strandgaard, Inc. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 360

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 21, 1958

DocketNo. 62318; protests 296647-K, etc. (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 360 (Hagen & Strandgaard, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagen & Strandgaard, Inc. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 360 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 669, C. A. D. 669), the claim at 20 percent or at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C. A. D. 669, supra, were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for other furniture.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 669, C. A. D. 669), the claim at 20 percent or at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C. A. D. 669, supra, were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for other furniture.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cust. Ct. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagen-strandgaard-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1958.