Hagemann v. Hagemann

102 Ill. App. 479, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 549
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hagemann v. Hagemann. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Ill. App. 251
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 23, 1902·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Ball

delivered the opinion of the court.

A reading of the remanding order shows that nothing was left to be determined except a question of fact, namely, the identity of the notes which were contained in said envelope. The master finds them to have been :

The Wartzeck note...............$1,250.00.

The second Wartzeck note......... 550.00.

The Gulp note................... 1,000.00.

The Reimer note................. 1,000.00.

$3,800.00.

This finding has been approved by the chancellor. We have carefully examined the record in this case and can not say that its weight is manifestly and clearly against the finding, and that being so, we should not and will not disturb it. Siegel v. Andrews, 78 Ill. App. 611-616; affirmed, 181 Ill. 350-356.

The decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hagemann v. Hagemann, 102 Ill. App. 479, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 549 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

102 Ill. App. 479 (Hagemann v. Hagemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Siegel v. A. H. Andrews & Co.
54 N.E. 1008 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Siegel v. A. H. Andrews & Co.
78 Ill. App. 611 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)