Hagemann v. Hagemann
This text of 102 Ill. App. 479 (Hagemann v. Hagemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
A reading of the remanding order shows that nothing was left to be determined except a question of fact, namely, the identity of the notes which were contained in said envelope. The master finds them to have been :
The Wartzeck note...............$1,250.00.
The second Wartzeck note......... 550.00.
The Gulp note................... 1,000.00.
The Reimer note................. 1,000.00.
$3,800.00.
This finding has been approved by the chancellor. We have carefully examined the record in this case and can not say that its weight is manifestly and clearly against the finding, and that being so, we should not and will not disturb it. Siegel v. Andrews, 78 Ill. App. 611-616; affirmed, 181 Ill. 350-356.
The decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 Ill. App. 479, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagemann-v-hagemann-illappct-1902.