Hagel v. Griffin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hagel v. Griffin

1916 OK 938, 161 P. 175, 61 Okla. 254, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 877

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 14, 1916

Docket7481

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 938 (Hagel v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagel v. Griffin, 1916 OK 938, 161 P. 175, 61 Okla. 254, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 877 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

*255 Opinion by

JOHNSON, 0.

This appeal was taken by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants. The appeal was filed in this court on May 11, 1915. It was submitted on April 16, 1916, and the appeal was dismissed on account of failure of plaintiff in error to file brief. On April 27, 1916, the dismissal was set aside, and the appeal reinstated. The cause was set for oral argument in this court upon September 7, 1916, and continued by agreement until October 2, 1916.

Counsel did not appear to argue the case, and no briefs have been filed by either plaintiff in error or defendants in error. Plaintiff in error will be held to have abandoned his appeal; and the appeal should be dismissed for failure to file brief and want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*255 Opinion by

JOHNSON, 0.

This appeal was taken by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants. The appeal was filed in this court on May 11, 1915. It was submitted on April 16, 1916, and the appeal was dismissed on account of failure of plaintiff in error to file brief. On April 27, 1916, the dismissal was set aside, and the appeal reinstated. The cause was set for oral argument in this court upon September 7, 1916, and continued by agreement until October 2, 1916.

Counsel did not appear to argue the case, and no briefs have been filed by either plaintiff in error or defendants in error. Plaintiff in error will be held to have abandoned his appeal; and the appeal should be dismissed for failure to file brief and want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 938, 161 P. 175, 61 Okla. 254, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagel-v-griffin-okla-1916.