Hagedorn v. Powers & Baird

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hagedorn v. Powers & Baird

95 S.E. 749, 22 Ga. App. 189, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 232

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1918

Docket8946

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 749 (Hagedorn v. Powers & Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagedorn v. Powers & Baird, 95 S.E. 749, 22 Ga. App. 189, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 232 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A plaintiff in execution may bring suit in his own name on a forthcoming bond payable to the levying officer, given by a claimant, and, on proof of a breach of the bond, ..may recover the value of the property delivered under the bond, if the value does not exceed the amount of his judgment. Civil Code, § 13. See also Hart v. Thomas, 75 Ga. 529; Bowman v. Kidd, 13 Ga. App. 351 (79 S. E. 167).

2. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition, or in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI