Hagedorn v. Hagedorn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hagedorn v. Hagedorn

448 S.W.3d 352, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1279, 2014 WL 5840729

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 2014·No. WD 76839·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Valerie Hagedorn (Mother) appeals the judgment of the trial court modifying the decree dissolving her marriage to Thomas Hagedorn (Father). She contends that the trial court abused its discretion in finding the presumed child support amount of $1820 per month unjust and inappropriate and ordering Father to pay $0 per month; failing to order Father to pay a portion of daughter’s college expenses; and refusing to award her at least a portion of her attorney’s fees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Valerie Hagedorn (Mother) appeals the judgment of the trial court modifying the decree dissolving her marriage to Thomas Hagedorn (Father). She contends that the trial court abused its discretion in finding the presumed child support amount of $1820 per month unjust and inappropriate and ordering Father to pay $0 per month; failing to order Father to pay a portion of daughter’s college expenses; and refusing to award her at least a portion of her attorney’s fees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Hagedorn v. Hagedorn, 448 S.W.3d 352, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1279, 2014 WL 5840729 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

448 S.W.3d 352 (Hagedorn v. Hagedorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.