Hagarty v. Moyka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hagarty v. Moyka

168 A.D. 924, 152 N.Y.S. 1115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 924 (Hagarty v. Moyka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagarty v. Moyka, 168 A.D. 924, 152 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Without expressing an opinion as to whether the complaint states a cause of action, we are of opinion that the answer puts in issue the allegations of the complaint, and it cannot be regarded as frivolous. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and dis[925]*925bursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Without expressing an opinion as to whether the complaint states a cause of action, we are of opinion that the answer puts in issue the allegations of the complaint, and it cannot be regarded as frivolous. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and dis[925]*925bursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 924, 152 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagarty-v-moyka-nyappdiv-1915.