Hagans v. State
This text of 649 So. 2d 325 (Hagans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm the appellants’ convictions and sentences. The sentencing claim pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), is rejected because the consecutive habitual offender sentences were imposed for crimes which were part of separate criminal episodes. See Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 633 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 980 (Fla.1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 432, 1995 WL 26809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagans-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.