Hagans v. State
649 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 432, 1995 WL 26809
Opinions
We affirm the appellants’ convictions and sentences. The sentencing claim pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), is rejected because the consecutive habitual offender sentences were imposed for crimes which were part of separate criminal episodes. See Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 633 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 980 (Fla.1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hagans v. State, 649 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 432, 1995 WL 26809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
649 So. 2d 325 (Hagans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Parker v. State
633 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Murray v. State
491 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)