Hagans v. State

649 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 432, 1995 WL 26809
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 26, 1995
DocketNos. 93-2248, 93-2305
StatusPublished

This text of 649 So. 2d 325 (Hagans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hagans v. State, 649 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 432, 1995 WL 26809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellants’ convictions and sentences. The sentencing claim pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), is rejected because the consecutive habitual offender sentences were imposed for crimes which were part of separate criminal episodes. See Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 633 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 980 (Fla.1994).

ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., concurs and dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Parker v. State
633 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Murray v. State
491 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
649 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 432, 1995 WL 26809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagans-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.