Hagan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hagan v. State

180 S.W.3d 512, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1916, 2005 WL 3526565

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 27, 2005

DocketWD 64973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 S.W.3d 512 (Hagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagan v. State, 180 S.W.3d 512, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1916, 2005 WL 3526565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hagan appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hagan appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.W.3d 512, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1916, 2005 WL 3526565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack