Hagan v. State
This text of 124 S.E. 823 (Hagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence was conflicting, but the jury, as shown by the verdict, accepted the testimony of the prosecutor, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The several assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court, and the special assignments of error because of the court’s failure to charge as complained of, in the light of the charge when read in its entirety, are without merit. The defendant has had a legal trial, and for no reason pointed out in the record was it error to.overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.E. 823, 32 Ga. App. 770, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-state-gactapp-1924.