Hagan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hagan v. State

888 So. 2d 758, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19470, 2004 WL 2921666

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 20, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-0731

StatusPublished

This text of 888 So. 2d 758 (Hagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagan v. State, 888 So. 2d 758, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19470, 2004 WL 2921666 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tommy Gene Hagan, raises two issues on appeal. We affirm the first issue without further discussion. As to the second issue, wherein appellant challenges [759]*759section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2003), we adhere to this Court’s opinion in Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC 03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003), and affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, finding that his designation as a sexual predator did not violate procedural due process under the federal or state constitutions. We again certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC03-2103 (Fla. Nov. 10, 2003).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tommy Gene Hagan, raises two issues on appeal. We affirm the first issue without further discussion. As to the second issue, wherein appellant challenges [759]*759section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2003), we adhere to this Court’s opinion in Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC 03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003), and affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, finding that his designation as a sexual predator did not violate procedural due process under the federal or state constitutions. We again certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC03-2103 (Fla. Nov. 10, 2003).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

888 So. 2d 758, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19470, 2004 WL 2921666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack