Hagan v. Blindell

Fifth Circuit

Hagan v. Blindell

56 F. 696, 6 C.C.A. 86, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 29, 1893·No. No. 117·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

TOULMTN, District Judge.

The only practical question presented by the record is whether the court below had jurisdiction of the case, as made by the bill. We concur in the conclusion reached by the learned judge who decided the case below, as expressed in his opinion, and which is made a part of the record, that the jurisdiction of the court is maintainable on general principles of equitable jurisdiction; and a careful examination of the case satisfies us that, under all the facts before it, there was no error in the court awarding a preliminary injunction.

The decree is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOULMTN, District Judge.

The only practical question presented by the record is whether the court below had jurisdiction of the case, as made by the bill. We concur in the conclusion reached by the learned judge who decided the case below, as expressed in his opinion, and which is made a part of the record, that the jurisdiction of the court is maintainable on general principles of equitable jurisdiction; and a careful examination of the case satisfies us that, under all the facts before it, there was no error in the court awarding a preliminary injunction.

The decree is therefore affirmed.

Hagan v. Blindell, 56 F. 696, 6 C.C.A. 86, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104 (5th Cir. 1893).

Pincite

56 F. 696 (Hagan v. Blindell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related