Hagan v. Blindell

56 F. 696, 6 C.C.A. 86, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 1893
DocketNo. 117
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 56 F. 696 (Hagan v. Blindell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hagan v. Blindell, 56 F. 696, 6 C.C.A. 86, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104 (5th Cir. 1893).

Opinion

TOULMTN, District Judge.

The only practical question presented by the record is whether the court below had jurisdiction of the case, as made by the bill. We concur in the conclusion reached by the learned judge who decided the case below, as expressed in his opinion, and which is made a part of the record, that the jurisdiction of the court is maintainable on general principles of equitable jurisdiction; and a careful examination of the case satisfies us that, under all the facts before it, there was no error in the court awarding a preliminary injunction.

The decree is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paine Lumber Co. v. Neal
244 U.S. 459 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Bigelow v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.
155 F. 869 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan, 1907)
Leonard v. Abner-Drury Brewing Co.
25 App. D.C. 161 (D.C. Circuit, 1905)
Union Pac. R. Co. v. Ruef
120 F. 102 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, 1902)
City of Atlanta v. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Co.
101 F. 900 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee, 1900)
Block v. Standard Distilling & Distributing Co.
95 F. 978 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1899)
American Steel & Wire Co. v. Wire Drawers' & Die Makers' Unions Nos. 1 & 3
90 F. 608 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1898)
Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miami S. S. Co.
86 F. 407 (Fifth Circuit, 1898)
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnell
82 F. 65 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee, 1897)
Greer, Mills & Co. v. Stoller
77 F. 1 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1896)
Davis v. Zimmerman
36 N.Y.S. 303 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Elder v. Whitesides
72 F. 724 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1895)
Pidcock v. Harrington
64 F. 821 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1894)
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R.
60 F. 803 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. 696, 6 C.C.A. 86, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-blindell-ca5-1893.