Hagan v. Blindell
This text of 56 F. 696 (Hagan v. Blindell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only practical question presented by the record is whether the court below had jurisdiction of the case, as made by the bill. We concur in the conclusion reached by the learned judge who decided the case below, as expressed in his opinion, and which is made a part of the record, that the jurisdiction of the court is maintainable on general principles of equitable jurisdiction; and a careful examination of the case satisfies us that, under all the facts before it, there was no error in the court awarding a preliminary injunction.
The decree is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. 696, 6 C.C.A. 86, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-blindell-ca5-1893.