Haga v. Holcombe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Haga v. Holcombe

249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 520, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2749

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 12, 1978

Docket56464

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.E.2d 695 (Haga v. Holcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haga v. Holcombe, 249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 520, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2749 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this property damage suit, defendant’s motion for directed verdict was denied. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and judgment was entered. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and it was granted. On appeal the plaintiffs only enumeration of error requires a consideration of the evidence. No transcript of the evidence has been filed nor has the evidence adduced at trial been otherwise submitted under the methods outlined in Code Ann. § 6-805. Accordingly, we must assume that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion. Davis v. Davis, 232 Ga. 851 (209 SE2d 187).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Argued September 19, 1978 Decided October 12, 1978. Wininger & Gregory, David R. Wininger, for appellant. Glyndon C. Pruitt, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this property damage suit, defendant’s motion for directed verdict was denied. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and judgment was entered. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and it was granted. On appeal the plaintiffs only enumeration of error requires a consideration of the evidence. No transcript of the evidence has been filed nor has the evidence adduced at trial been otherwise submitted under the methods outlined in Code Ann. § 6-805. Accordingly, we must assume that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion. Davis v. Davis, 232 Ga. 851 (209 SE2d 187).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Argued September 19, 1978 Decided October 12, 1978. Wininger & Gregory, David R. Wininger, for appellant. Glyndon C. Pruitt, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 520, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haga-v-holcombe-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack