Haftel v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund
478 So. 2d 350, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 592, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4030
This text of 478 So. 2d 350 (Haftel v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haftel v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund, 478 So. 2d 350, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 592, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4030 (Fla. 1985).
Opinion
This case is before us to answer a certified question of great public importance.
It is so ordered.
Haftel v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund, 464 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985):
Whether a claim against the Florida Patient's Compensation Fund arises at the time of the alleged medical malpractice, rather than when judgment is entered against the tortfeasor, and is governed by the two year statute of limitations provided by Section 95.-[351]*351ll(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), so that the Fund must be made or joined as a party defendant within two years after the malpractice action accrues?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taddiken v. FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND
478 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Haftel v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund
464 So. 2d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
478 So. 2d 350, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 592, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haftel-v-florida-patients-compensation-fund-fla-1985.