Haft v. State

458 So. 2d 1228, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2457, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16354
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2255
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 1228 (Haft v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haft v. State, 458 So. 2d 1228, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2457, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16354 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no error in the judgment that Norman F. Haft is guilty of criminal contempt. The appropriate fine for such an offense cannot exceed $500, however, the fine imposed here was $2,500. Section 775.02, Florida Statutes (1983); Aaron v. State, 284 So.2d 673 (Fla.1973) and Thomas A. Edison College, Inc. v. State Board of Independent Colleges & Universities, 411 So.2d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Thus, the order appealed is remanded to the trial court with directions to reduce the fine to not more than $500.00. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Green
732 So. 2d 6 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 1228, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2457, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haft-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.