Haflett v. Sebring
242 A.D. 892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published
Opinion
Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs. The judgment is against an attorney for funds which he withheld from a client. The orders deny attorney’s motion to bring in his former partner and another' as eodefendants. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haflett v. Sebring, 242 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 892 (Haflett v. Sebring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.