Hafleigh v. Crossingham
206 N.C. 333
Opinion
The trial judge ruled correctly. The denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not appealable, as the same is not a final judgment. It was the duty of the plaintiff to have excepted to the refusal of the judge to grant the motion so that it could have been considered on an appeal from the final judgment. Gilliam v. Jones, 191 N. C., 621, 132 S. E., 566.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hafleigh v. Crossingham, 206 N.C. 333 (N.C. 1934).
206 N.C. 333 (Hafleigh v. Crossingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Erickson v. Starling
71 S.E.2d 384 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)