Hafford v. State

574 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1338, 1991 WL 2741
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1991
DocketNo. 89-0780
StatusPublished

This text of 574 So. 2d 1123 (Hafford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hafford v. State, 574 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1338, 1991 WL 2741 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing to the extent that upon remand of this cause to the trial court [1124]*1124we direct that the sentencing provision concerning visitation be stricken, the state having agreed that this provision is unnecessary and that the issue is moot.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES, H„ (Retired) Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1338, 1991 WL 2741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hafford-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.