Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.

1937 OK 38, 65 P.2d 440, 179 Okla. 235, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 388
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 26, 1937·No. No. 27684.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a second appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment in foreclosure proceedings. The land has been sold and a writ of assistance issued, The original judgment was entered upon stipulation of the attorneys for the parties, and the stipulation agreeing to wait eight months from the date thereof was liberally adhered to on the part of the plaintiff. In fact, 19 additional days were given the defendants. We find nothing in the second motion to vacate not contained in the first motion or which could not have been considered by the court at that time. We *236 have carefully checked the record, and are of the opinion that the appeal is without merit and taken for delay only.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, O. J., BAYLESS, Y. O. J., and BUSBY, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co., 1937 OK 38, 65 P.2d 440, 179 Okla. 235, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 388 (Okla. 1937).

1937 OK 38 (Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. Stephens
1952 OK 390 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)
Sabin v. Levorsen
1949 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1949)
Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.
1940 OK 491 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)