Hafelin v. Silverman

11 Misc. 723, 32 N.Y.S. 918, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 344
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Misc. 723 (Hafelin v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hafelin v. Silverman, 11 Misc. 723, 32 N.Y.S. 918, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 344 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The affidavits on the part of the defendants on the proceedings to rebond the property sufficiently complied with the statute, and the court below had power to allow a new undertaking to bé filed mino joro fame. !

There was, therefore, no abuse of discretion in the court ■below, and the order appealed from, must be affirmed,' with costs. . - ~

Newburger and Vah Wyck, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, ydth costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Misc. 723, 32 N.Y.S. 918, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hafelin-v-silverman-nynyccityct-1895.