Hafelin v. Silverman
This text of 11 Misc. 723 (Hafelin v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavits on the part of the defendants on the proceedings to rebond the property sufficiently complied with the statute, and the court below had power to allow a new undertaking to bé filed mino joro fame. !
There was, therefore, no abuse of discretion in the court ■below, and the order appealed from, must be affirmed,' with costs. . - ~
Newburger and Vah Wyck, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, ydth costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Misc. 723, 32 N.Y.S. 918, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hafelin-v-silverman-nynyccityct-1895.