Hafed v. United States Supreme Court

352 F. App'x 447
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 28, 2009·No. No. 09-5064·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 20, 2009, 2009 WL 453122, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined it lacked authority to review any decision of the Supreme Court or to order the Supreme Court to take any action. See In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C.Cir.1992) (per curiam).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after [448]*448resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hafed v. United States Supreme Court, 352 F. App'x 447 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

352 F. App'x 447 (Hafed v. United States Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related