Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
PUBLISH September 6, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
SHAABAN SHAABAN HAFED,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. Nos. 09-1090 & 09-1365 (D.C. No. 1:07-CV-01499-ZLW -KM T) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; (D. Colo.) M ICHAEL M UKASEY; HARLEY LAPPIN; RON W ILEY; ROD BAUER, sued in their official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.
O RDER
Before BRISCO E, Chief Judge, and BALDO CK, Circuit Judge.
On February 4, 2011, we granted appellant’s motion for an extension of
time to pay the filing fee in No. 09-1365 and directed that the entire filing fee for
No. 09-1365 must be paid no later than September 1, 2011. W e further notified
appellant that his failure to pay the filing fee as directed would result in the
dismissal of No. 09-1365 for failure to prosecute, and the dismissal of
No. 09-1090 as moot. See Hafed v. Fed. Bur. of Prisons, 635 F.3d 1172, 1180
(10th Cir. 2011). Appellant has not paid the filing fee for No. 09-1365 as directed. Accordingly, No. 09-1365 is dismissed for failure to prosecute, and
No. 09-1090 is dismissed as moot.
Entered for the Court,
ELISABETH A. SHUM AKER, Clerk
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
635 F.3d 1172 (Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.