Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
FILED
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
PUBLISH
September 6, 2011
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
SHAABAN SHAABAN HAFED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. Nos. 09-1090 & 09-1365 (D.C. No. 1:07-CV-01499-ZLW -KM T)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; (D. Colo.) M ICHAEL M UKASEY; HARLEY LAPPIN; RON W ILEY; ROD BAUER, sued in their official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.
O RDER
Before BRISCO E, Chief Judge, and BALDO CK, Circuit Judge.
On February 4, 2011, we granted appellant’s motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee in No. 09-1365 and directed that the entire filing fee for No. 09-1365 must be paid no later than September 1, 2011. W e further notified appellant that his failure to pay the filing fee as directed would result in the dismissal of No. 09-1365 for failure to prosecute, and the dismissal of No. 09-1090 as moot. See Hafed v. Fed. Bur. of Prisons, 635 F.3d 1172, 1180 (10th Cir. 2011). Appellant has not paid the filing fee for No. 09-1365 as
directed. Accordingly, No. 09-1365 is dismissed for failure to prosecute, and No. 09-1090 is dismissed as moot.
Entered for the Court,
ELISABETH A. SHUM AKER, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
635 F.3d 1172 (Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.