Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

635 F.3d 1172
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2011·No. 09-1090·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

PUBLISH September 6, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS Clerk of Court

TENTH CIRCUIT

SHAABAN SHAABAN HAFED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. Nos. 09-1090 & 09-1365 (D.C. No. 1:07-CV-01499-ZLW -KM T) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; (D. Colo.) M ICHAEL M UKASEY; HARLEY LAPPIN; RON W ILEY; ROD BAUER, sued in their official capacities,

Defendants-Appellees.

O RDER

Before BRISCO E, Chief Judge, and BALDO CK, Circuit Judge.

On February 4, 2011, we granted appellant’s motion for an extension of

time to pay the filing fee in No. 09-1365 and directed that the entire filing fee for

No. 09-1365 must be paid no later than September 1, 2011. W e further notified

appellant that his failure to pay the filing fee as directed would result in the

dismissal of No. 09-1365 for failure to prosecute, and the dismissal of

No. 09-1090 as moot. See Hafed v. Fed. Bur. of Prisons, 635 F.3d 1172, 1180

(10th Cir. 2011). Appellant has not paid the filing fee for No. 09-1365 as directed. Accordingly, No. 09-1365 is dismissed for failure to prosecute, and

No. 09-1090 is dismissed as moot.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUM AKER, Clerk

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 635 F.3d 1172 (10th Cir. 2011).

635 F.3d 1172 (Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hafed v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
635 F.3d 1172 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)