Haehnlen v. Commonwealth

13 Pa. 617
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The United States vs. Kirkpatrick, is the leading authority for a principle which covers the ease.. While that authority remains unshaken, to show that it was the duty of the accounting 'officers to prevent the defalcation, is to show nothing. That case, and many others in our own hooks, prove beyond, question, that the right of the commonwealth cannot be lost by the laches of its agents. ■ The present offers nothing new, nor any circumstance to take it out of the rule of policy we have invariably enforced. .

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haehnlen v. Commonwealth, 13 Pa. 617 (Pa. 1850).

13 Pa. 617 (Haehnlen v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson Grain Co. v. Lee
190 So. 464 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Co.
23 A. 549 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1892)