Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.
229 A.D. 742
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that the charge, in its entirety, failed to state adequately the duty of the defendants with respect to the maintenance of the cesspool and the duty of the decedent in using it. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co., 229 A.D. 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
229 A.D. 742 (Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Dein
233 A.D. 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)