Hadyk v. Babish

295 A.D.2d 885, 743 N.Y.S.2d 751, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6177
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2002
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 885 (Hadyk v. Babish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hadyk v. Babish, 295 A.D.2d 885, 743 N.Y.S.2d 751, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Stone, J.), entered March 23, 2001, which [886]*886granted the motion of defendants John G. Babish and Paracelsian, Inc. for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988, 988; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 A.D.2d 885, 743 N.Y.S.2d 751, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadyk-v-babish-nyappdiv-2002.