Hadnot v. State

54 S.W.2d 99, 122 Tex. Crim. 221, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 691
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 26, 1932·No. No. 15274.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for felony theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Our attention is called by the state’s attorney with this court to the fact that the bills of exception and statement of facts are filed too late for our consideration. The limit of the time within which same may be filed, as fixed by statute, is. ninety days after the giving of notice of appeal. From this, record we observe that notice of appeal was given December 5. 1931. The statement of facts and bills of exception were filed on March 10, 1932. Computation shows this to be ninety-six days after the date of the notice of appeal. We are not, allowed, under the statute, to consider either the bills of exception or the statement of facts. The charge of the court, the judgment and sentence are in proper form.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hadnot v. State, 54 S.W.2d 99, 122 Tex. Crim. 221, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 691 (Tex. 1932).

54 S.W.2d 99 (Hadnot v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knighton v. State
72 S.W.2d 602 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)