Hadlock v. Bulfinch
This text of 31 Me. 246 (Hadlock v. Bulfinch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for a new trial. The testimony was too voluminous to be reported. The following are the principles, as announced by Howard, J., upon which the decision of the Court was made.
[247]*247A mortgage of land can be discharged only by payment of the debt secured by it, or by a release.
A renewal of the note, secured by such mortgage, is not such a payment as will discharge the mortgage, unless so intended by the parties.
"Where the mortgagee taires, for the amount due upon the mortgage, the note of the assignee of the mortgager, including annual interest, and gives up to such assignee the notes of the mortgager, this, unexplained, is not to be considered as a mere renewal of the mortgager’s note, but as a substitution of a new security, and is such a payment as to discharge the mortgage.
If the mortgage debt has been paid, no action can be maintained upon the mortgage, even though it has not been formally discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Me. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadlock-v-bulfinch-me-1850.