Hadley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hadley v. State

423 S.W.3d 291, 2014 WL 538270, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 138

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 2014·No. No. ED 99817·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Orlando Hadley filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion court denied Hadley’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court’s denial.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, [292] setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Orlando Hadley filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion court denied Hadley’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court’s denial.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, [292] setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hadley v. State, 423 S.W.3d 291, 2014 WL 538270, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

423 S.W.3d 291 (Hadley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.