Hadley v. Garey
This text of 115 A. 821 (Hadley v. Garey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An action for damages caused by defendant’s automobile colliding with a heifer belonging to the plaintiff. It is alleged that the defendant was negligent in the operation of his automobile. The jury heard the evidence and found for the defendant. The case is before this court on a motion for a new trial on the usual grounds,, The issue was solely one of fact. An examination of the evidence does not satisfy us that the verdict of the jury is so manifestly wrong as to warrant interference by this court. Entry will be. Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A. 821, 121 Me. 576, 1922 Me. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadley-v-garey-me-1922.