Hadley v. City of Coatesville

78 Pa. Super. 469, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 142
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 3, 1922
DocketNo. 2; Appeal, No. 203
StatusPublished

This text of 78 Pa. Super. 469 (Hadley v. City of Coatesville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hadley v. City of Coatesville, 78 Pa. Super. 469, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 142 (Pa. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiff is the husband of Elizabeth H. Hadley who was injured by a fall on one of the public streets in Coatesville. His action arises out of that injury. The defense presented at the trial was the contributory negligence of Mrs. Hadley. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and from the judgments entered appeals were taken. The question raised on this appeal was considered in the appeal of the same defendant from the judgment of Elizabeth H. Hadley in which appeal we held that the defense presented was not sufficient.

For the same reason the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Pa. Super. 469, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadley-v-city-of-coatesville-pasuperct-1922.