Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia/Hade v. Brotherton

Hade v. Brotherton

11 F. Cas. 148, 3 D.C. 594, 3 Cranch 594
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMay 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 F. Cas. 148 (Hade v. Brotherton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hade v. Brotherton, 11 F. Cas. 148, 3 D.C. 594, 3 Cranch 594 (circtddc 1829).

Opinion

The CoüRt (Moksell, J., contra,) was of opinion, upon the plea of nul tiel record, that it was such a record as is stated in the declaration.

Morsell, J., thought it could not be considered as a record, because not made out in full form of a technical record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koehne v. Price
68 A.2d 806 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 148, 3 D.C. 594, 3 Cranch 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hade-v-brotherton-circtddc-1829.