Haddock v. Board of Public Instruction
This text of 139 So. 147 (Haddock v. Board of Public Instruction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. The constitution provides that county school funds shall be used “solely for the support and maintenance of public free schools”. Even if a three-year teacher’s contract is contemplated by the law and such contract is illegally breached by the County Board of Public Instruction, whereupon the teacher takes other employment at less salary, such teacher cannot recover against the county school fund the difference between the contract salary and the smaller salary earned in other employments since that would in effect violate the constitutional command that such fund shall be used “solely for the support and maintenance of public free schools. ’ ’
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Davis, J., concur.
Buford, C.J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.
Terrell. J., not participating.
Brown, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 So. 147, 103 Fla. 1157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddock-v-board-of-public-instruction-fla-1932.