Haddix v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Haddix v. State

722 S.W.2d 600, 291 Ark. 138

DecidedJanuary 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 722 S.W.2d 600 (Haddix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haddix v. State, 722 S.W.2d 600, 291 Ark. 138 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Robert Haddix, by his attorney, Kirby Riffel, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our per curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Robert Haddix, by his attorney, Kirby Riffel, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our per curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 S.W.2d 600, 291 Ark. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddix-v-state-ark-1987.