Haddix v. MAJCHRZYCKI

691 N.W.2d 455, 472 Mich. 851
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2005
Docket126496
StatusPublished

This text of 691 N.W.2d 455 (Haddix v. MAJCHRZYCKI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haddix v. MAJCHRZYCKI, 691 N.W.2d 455, 472 Mich. 851 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

691 N.W.2d 455 (2005)

HADDIX
v.
MAJCHRZYCKI

No. 126496.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2005.

SC: 126496, COA: 244983.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of both (1) the procedural deficiency issue, which was raised sua sponte in the Court of Appeals, and (2) the substantive issue—whether plaintiff has a "serious impairment of body function"—in light of this Court's decision in Kreiner v. Fischer (Docket No. 124120) and Straub v. Collette (Docket No. 124757), 471 Mich. 109, 683 N.W.2d 611 (2004). We DIRECT the Court of Appeals to consider further briefing on either or both issues, if it is requested by either party.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kreiner v. Fischer
683 N.W.2d 611 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 N.W.2d 455, 472 Mich. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddix-v-majchrzycki-mich-2005.