Hadden v. Robbins

212 S.E.2d 372, 233 Ga. 547, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1373
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 29, 1975
Docket29549
StatusPublished

This text of 212 S.E.2d 372 (Hadden v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hadden v. Robbins, 212 S.E.2d 372, 233 Ga. 547, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1373 (Ga. 1975).

Opinions

Nichols, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment returning custody of a minor child (under the age of 14) to his mother.

The mother had obtained legal custody of her two minor children in a divorce proceeding between the parents. She subsequently remarried. The child whose custody is in dispute in this proceeding voluntarily left the home of his mother and stepfather and went to the home of his father. The mother filed application for writ of habeas corpus against the father seeking a return of the child to her. The father filed a counterclaim alleging a change of circumstances and seeking to obtain custody of the child.

There was evidence for the father to indicate that the mother’s home had been disrupted since the stepfather had obtained custody of two of his children by a former marriage; that the stepfather had severely punished the child whose custody is here involved; and that it was because of the child’s fear of the punishment of his stepfather that he ran away from his mother’s home and came to his father.

The mother’s evidence, on the contrary, indicated that the stepfather had a good relationship with his stepchildren; that he participated in many activities with them; and that he did not discipline them in an abusive manner.

On this conflicting evidence the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in returning the child to the custody of his mother.

Argued January 15, 1975 — Decided January 29, 1975 Rehearing denied February 11, 1975. Leiden & CoCroft, Terrance Patrick Leiden, for appellant. Harris, Chance & McCracken, Albert Pickett, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, J, who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 S.E.2d 372, 233 Ga. 547, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadden-v-robbins-ga-1975.