Haddad v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Haddad v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 412

United States Customs Court·Decided February 20, 1957·No. No. 60502; protests 215596-K and 228441-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, was sustained. The item marked “B,” stipulated to consist of silk scarves or squares similar to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), were held dutiable at 32)4 percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 218 (f), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, was sustained. The item marked “B,” stipulated to consist of silk scarves or squares similar to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), were held dutiable at 32)4 percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Haddad v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 412 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 412 (Haddad v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.