Haddad v. TSOUKALAS
715 N.W.2d 23, 475 Mich. 872
Opinion
Mark HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
George TSOUKALAS, Defendant-Appellant, and
Alexander Harlambos Sakellaris and Alexandra Sakellaris, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haddad v. TSOUKALAS, 715 N.W.2d 23, 475 Mich. 872 (Mich. 2006).
715 N.W.2d 23 (Haddad v. TSOUKALAS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pruett v. Flagstar Bank
715 N.W.2d 23 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)