Haddad v. TSOUKALAS
715 N.W.2d 23, 475 Mich. 872
This text of 715 N.W.2d 23 (Haddad v. TSOUKALAS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haddad v. TSOUKALAS, 715 N.W.2d 23, 475 Mich. 872 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Mark HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
George TSOUKALAS, Defendant-Appellant, and
Alexander Harlambos Sakellaris and Alexandra Sakellaris, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pruett v. Flagstar Bank
715 N.W.2d 23 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
715 N.W.2d 23, 475 Mich. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddad-v-tsoukalas-mich-2006.