Haddad v. Russell

Ohio Supreme Court

Haddad v. Russell

709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1398

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 28, 1999

Docket99-273

StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 172 (Haddad v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haddad v. Russell, 709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1398 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on a filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a writ of habeas corpus be, and hereby is, allowed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent file a return of the writ within twenty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days of filing of the return.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 98-2694, State ex rel. Bray v. Russell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on a filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a writ of habeas corpus be, and hereby is, allowed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent file a return of the writ within twenty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days of filing of the return.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 98-2694, State ex rel. Bray v. Russell.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddad-v-russell-ohio-1999.