Haddad v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Haddad v. Board of Appeals

355 N.E.2d 492, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 843

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedOctober 14, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 355 N.E.2d 492 (Haddad v. Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haddad v. Board of Appeals, 355 N.E.2d 492, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 843 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

It is impossible to give intelligent consideration to any of the plaintiffs’ contentions without (a) the trial transcript and (b) the unanswered demands for admissions of fact which the judge made parts of his findings. None of that material has been reproduced in the plaintiffs’ appendix, and “we see no occasion to send for the original papers in order to discover whether there is any merit to the ... [plaintiffs’] contentions.” Slater v. Burnham Corp. ante, 791 (1976). See also Storer v. Anderson, ante, 809 (1976).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is impossible to give intelligent consideration to any of the plaintiffs’ contentions without (a) the trial transcript and (b) the unanswered demands for admissions of fact which the judge made parts of his findings. None of that material has been reproduced in the plaintiffs’ appendix, and “we see no occasion to send for the original papers in order to discover whether there is any merit to the ... [plaintiffs’] contentions.” Slater v. Burnham Corp. ante, 791 (1976). See also Storer v. Anderson, ante, 809 (1976).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 N.E.2d 492, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddad-v-board-of-appeals-massappct-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack