Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 560 (Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation reading as follows:
(1) That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement herein, consists of footwear imported from Japan, and that such articles are identified in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof;
(2) That export value, as defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise herein;
(3) That such statutory export value for the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement herein, is the invoiced unit price, ex-factory, net packing included;
(4) That there is no higher foreign value for the herein merchandise.
On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the articles identified in schedule “A,” attached hereto, and that such value is the invoiced unit price, ex-factory, net, packing included.
Judgment will issue accordingly.
[561]*561Schedule A
The manufacturer and seller of the merchandise herein is:
Hayakawa Rubber Co., Ltd. Fukuyama, Japan
R59/15115 (Export Date: October 11, 1958)
Baltimore Collector’s No. 5810
Baltimore Entry No. 5836 (Dec. 1, 1958)
Rubber shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)
SR-0138 — children’s sizes — 64 dozen pair invoiced at US $1.65 per dozen paid, ex-factory, net, packed
SR-0139 — ladies sizes — 300 dozen paid — invoiced at US $2.40 per dozen pair, ex-factory, net, packed
SRr-0140 — men’s sizes — 60 dozen pair — invoiced at US $2.60 per dozen pair, ex-factory, net, packed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Cust. Ct. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddad-sons-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1961.