Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 653

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 13, 1960

DocketReap. Dec. 9663; Entry No. 788661

StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 653 (Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 653 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement for decision upon stipulation on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis of value for the footwear imported from Japan involved herein and identified in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, [654]*654and that such value is the invoiced unit price, ex-factory, net, packing included.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule A

Type of merchandise:

Rubber Shoes

Children’s Sponge Sandals (Zobi)

Art. No. SR-0138

Manufacturer and seller:

Hatakawa Rubber Co., Ltd.

Fukuyama, Japan

Quantity and price

1248 dozen pair at $1.65 per dozen pairs, ex-factory net, packing included.

Export date:

September 12, 1958

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI