Hadaway v. Kelly

78 Ill. 286
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 78 Ill. 286 (Hadaway v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hadaway v. Kelly, 78 Ill. 286 (Ill. 1875).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

During the pendency of this cause in the circuit court, the parties agreed to refer all matters in difference between them to arbitration, which was done. The arbitrators chosen, after hearing the evidence offered, made their award in writing, which was duly presented to the court, when appellant moved to set it aside, on the ground it had been obtained by undue means and misbehavior on the part of the arbitrators and of appellee, which motion the court overruled, and entered judgment in favor of appellee for the amount named in the award.

We have examined with sufficient care the affidavits filed in support of the motion, but are unable to discover any evidence whatever that any undue means “was used by any one to procure the making of the award,” or any evidence of any misbehavior on the part of the arbitrators. There is absolutely nothing in this record that casts the least suspicion upon the conduct of any of the arbitrators, or any party interested in the matter.

Complaint is made, the arbitrators failed to allow some items in appellant’s account that the evidence clearly established in his favor, but that is a- matter that can not be inquired into in this way. The law, in the absence of proof of fraud, will presume the arbitrators considered all the evidence, and allowed such items to the respective parties as they considered proven. Their finding, like that of a court, must be regarded as embracing all matters submitted to them, and, unless impeached in some manner known to the law, must stand as conclusive of the rights of the parties.

. There is no reason whatever shown for setting aside the award, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Costello v. Illinois Farmers Insurance
636 N.E.2d 710 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1993)
Sweet v. Steve's Cartage Co.
365 N.E.2d 1110 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)
Pillott v. Allstate Insurance Co.
363 N.E.2d 460 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)
Thatcher Implement & Mercantile Co. v. Brubaker
187 S.W. 117 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1916)
Seaton v. Kendall
49 N.E. 561 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)
Faust v. Mayor of Huntsville
83 Ala. 279 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
The Union
20 F. 539 (N.D. Illinois, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Ill. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadaway-v-kelly-ill-1875.