Hadash v. Qatabi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hadash v. Qatabi

141 A.D.2d 802, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A.D.2d 802 (Hadash v. Qatabi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hadash v. Qatabi, 141 A.D.2d 802, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions seeking an accounting and partition of real property, Nasser Qatabi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated October 13, 1987, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion to direct the receiver to enter into a contract of sale with the plaintiffs for the property known as 145 Court Street, also known as 199 Pacific Street, Brooklyn, New York.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the court’s determination that the plaintiffs are the successful bidders pursuant to the terms of the par[803]*803ties’ stipulation and this court’s prior decision and order (see, Hadash v Qatabi, 131 AD2d 433). Mangano, J. P., Spatt, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions seeking an accounting and partition of real property, Nasser Qatabi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated October 13, 1987, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion to direct the receiver to enter into a contract of sale with the plaintiffs for the property known as 145 Court Street, also known as 199 Pacific Street, Brooklyn, New York.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the court’s determination that the plaintiffs are the successful bidders pursuant to the terms of the par[803]*803ties’ stipulation and this court’s prior decision and order (see, Hadash v Qatabi, 131 AD2d 433). Mangano, J. P., Spatt, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A.D.2d 802, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hadash-v-qatabi-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack