Haczela v. Kral

243 A.D.2d 444, 665 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9384

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant wife appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered October 26, 1995, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff husband a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment and distributed the marital property pursuant to the terms of an antenuptial agreement dated May 25, 1988, and a stipulation of settlement entered into in open court on July 26, 1995.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court’s finding that the husband was entitled to a divorce from the wife on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment is supported by the record and we see no reason to disturb its determination (see, Kahn v Kahn, 221 AD2d 320; Soto v Soto, 216 AD2d 455).

The wife’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haczela v. Kral, 243 A.D.2d 444, 665 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 444 (Haczela v. Kral) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soto v. Soto
216 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Kahn v. Kahn
221 A.D.2d 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)