Hacquin v. Collier

87 Misc. 2d 994, 386 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2343
New York City Family Court·Decided July 9, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Richard D. Rosenbloom, J.

This is a motion brought by respondent to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action. The petition is for support and is filed under the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law, art 3-A). Petitioner alleges that she is the ex-wife of respondent and attaches a decree of divorce dated February 25, 1971.

Subdivision 1 of section 32 of the Domestic Relations Law provides that a husband is liable for the support of his wife. No mention is made throughout article 3-A of any liability to an ex-wife. The statute clearly imposes a liability on a husband to support his wife, but not his ex-wife. (Fleischer v Fleischer, 24 AD2d 667.)

Accordingly, respondent’s motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hacquin v. Collier, 87 Misc. 2d 994, 386 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2343 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1976).

87 Misc. 2d 994 (Hacquin v. Collier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lascaris v. Brunson
92 Misc. 2d 776 (New York Family Court, 1977)