Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Sixth Circuit

Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

162 F.2d 715, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1947·No. No. 10388·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered upon the record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the respective parties; and it appearing from the full memorandum opinion of the district court filed July 23, 1946, overruling the motion of [716] the plaintiff (now appellant) for a new trial, that the district court properly directed the jury to find for the defendant in the light of the Kentucky authorities applied to the facts in evidence, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered upon the record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the respective parties; and it appearing from the full memorandum opinion of the district court filed July 23, 1946, overruling the motion of [716] the plaintiff (now appellant) for a new trial, that the district court properly directed the jury to find for the defendant in the light of the Kentucky authorities applied to the facts in evidence, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 162 F.2d 715, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168 (6th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

162 F.2d 715 (Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.