Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Sixth Circuit

Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

162 F.2d 715, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1947

DocketNo. 10388

StatusPublished

This text of 162 F.2d 715 (Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hackworth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 162 F.2d 715, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168 (6th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered upon the record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the respective parties; and it appearing from the full memorandum opinion of the district court filed July 23, 1946, overruling the motion of [716]*716the plaintiff (now appellant) for a new trial, that the district court properly directed the jury to find for the defendant in the light of the Kentucky authorities applied to the facts in evidence, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered upon the record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the respective parties; and it appearing from the full memorandum opinion of the district court filed July 23, 1946, overruling the motion of [716]*716the plaintiff (now appellant) for a new trial, that the district court properly directed the jury to find for the defendant in the light of the Kentucky authorities applied to the facts in evidence, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 F.2d 715, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackworth-v-chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-ca6-1947.